Monday, June 28, 2010

Remaja Siam menderita sakit kulit, buah pinggang rayu sumbang


PENGKALAN HULU - Seorang remaja Siam yang menderita akibat penyakit kulit, buah pinggang dan gastrik sejak setahun lalu hanya bergantung kepada bantuan RM150 sebulan daripada Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat (JKM) bagi mendapatkan rawatan di Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah (HSB) Alor Setar setiap bulan selain untuk menampung kehidupannya.

Anutsara a/p Ai Sawang, 20, dari Kampung Tasik di sini juga terpaksa mengharapkan pendapatan ibunya Thong Noi a/p Imdiam Phuang, 54, seorang ibu tunggal, yang tidak seberapa pendapatannya dari hasil upah menoreh getah.

Anutsara, anak bongsu daripada lima beradik, yang kini hampir hilang penglihatan memberitahu Bernama di sini hari ini, dia hanya bergantung kepada bantuan JKM sebanyak RM150 untuk menampung kehidupannya.

Ibunya, yang mengidap penyakit sendi akibat demam Cikungunya sebelum ini, mengambil upah untuk menoreh getah dengan pendapatan tidak sampai RM200 sebulan, itu pun jika hari tidak hujan.

Bapa Anutsara sudah meninggal dunia empat tahun lalu.

Katanya, dia kini hanya duduk di rumah dan memerlukan bantuan dalam semua hal kerana penglihatannya sudah kabur manakala penyakit kulit yang teruk menyebabkan mukanya menjadi hitam serta lebam termasuk pada tangan, kaki dan badan.

Anutsara bagaimana pun berterima kasih kepada pihak Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah yang memberikan rawatan percuma kepadanya dan
ubat bagi penyakit yang dihidapinya.

Katanya, apabila dia perlu mendapatkan rawatan dan pemeriksaan di Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah, dia meminta bantuan keluarganya untuk membawanya ke hospital.

Sementara itu, Ketua Umno Cawangan Kampung Tasik Prawat a/l Din Cheeron, 49, berkata usaha membantu remaja itu dan keluarganya sudah dilakukan termasuk usaha mendapatkan sebuah rumah di bawah Program Pembangunan Rakyat Termiskin (PPRT)tetapi gagal.

Beliau turut merayu mana-mana pertubuhan termasuk Persatuan Siam Malaysia supaya membantu remaja itu dalam meringankan beban yang ditanggung.

Bagi mereka yang bersimpati dengan remaja ini bolehlah menghulurkan bantuan melalui akaun Maybank: 108075080391 (Anutsara A/P Ai Sawang, No. K/P: 901126-02-5034) atau di talian 019-5030695.

Sumber: http://bernama.com/bernama/v5/bm/newsindex.php?id=509103 dan http://www.sinarharian.com.my/bterkini/4726.asp

Hubungan kaum Siam dan kerajaan di negeri Kedah.

Kedah Sultanate

Around 170 CE a group of native refugees of Hindu faith arrived at Kedah, joining them soon were peoples from nearby islands and from the northern Mon-Khmer region. Ancient Kedah covered the areas of Kuala Bahang, Kuala Bara, Kuala Pila and Merpah, and the inhabitants of Kedah appointed Tun Derma Dewa and Tun Perkasa as their village chiefs.

In the year 630 CE, Maharaja Derbar Raja of Gemeron (now known as Bandar Abbas) in Persia was defeated in battle and escaped to Sri Lanka, and he was later blown off course by a storm to the remote shores of Kuala Sungai Qilah, Kedah. The inhabitants of Kedah found him to be a valiant and intelligent person, and they made him the king of Kedah. In the year 634 CE, a new kingdom was formed in Kedah consisting of Persian royalty and native Malay of Hindu faith, the capital was Langkasuka.
In the early days, Kedah was known by the Indians as Kedaram, Kidaram, Kalagam and Kataha, and Kalah or Kalaha by the Persians.In the 7th and 8th centuries, Kedah was under the domination of Srivijaya, and was later under SIAM, until the rise of the Malay sultanate of Melaka in the 15th century. In the 17th century, Kedah was attacked by the Portuguese after their conquest of Melaka, and by Aceh. In the hope that Great Britain would protect what remained of Kedah from Siam, the sultan handed over Penang and then Province Wellesley to the British at the end of the 18th century. The SIAMESE nevertheless conquered Kedah in 1811, and it remained under Siamese control until transferred to the British by the Anglo-Siamese Treaty of 1909.


-Medieval History

Early in the Medieval era, Kedah became part of Srivijaya (the dominant Malay state and a major power in the Indian Ocean trade). This led to rivalries with the Indian states, especially the Cholas from the 9th to 13th centuries CE. The Cholas had a powerful merchant and naval fleet in the Indian Ocean and the Bay of Bengal. In the early 11th century, Chola King Rajendra Chola I sent an expedition to invade Kadaram on behalf of one of its rulers who sought his assistance to gain the throne. Chola dominance was brief, but effectively crippled the power of Srivijaya.

-Invasion of Chola

In the early 11th century, inscriptions indicate that ties of friendship still existed between Chola and Kadaram of Srivijaya, however the commercial monopoly claimed by the Srivijayan Maharajas led to their friendship ended. The first Chola attack began in the year 1025, Rajendra's army sack Kadaram and the Srivijaya capital and took the Srivijaya king Sangrama Vijayottungavarman captive. The kingdom was restored to him only after he acknowledged Chola's sovereignty. The aim of the Cholas was probably just to force the empire to open its shipping lanes as Srivijaya was some 1,500 miles remote and difficult to control. Recovered Tamil inscriptions from the region show that there was Chola military presence till at least year 1088 in the Malay archipelago.

Scholars like R.C. Majumdar think that the emperor despatched more than one expedition to humble the Srivijayas, with 13 towns in the archipelago sacked by the Cholas has come from Rajendra's own inscriptions with six located on the Malay peninsula, four on Sumatra, the other being the Nicobar islands. Paul Wheatley have been sceptical of Rajendra's claims about the number of towns his army sacked, but most agree that a raid did take place.

George Spencer pointed out that the campaign is plausible because it fits the Chola pattern of compulsive expansion in this period, fits the aim of Rajendra to exceed his father's accomplishments and fits the persistent Chola need to locate fresh sources of plunder or tribute. There is evidence to show that the king of Kambujadesa sent a chariot to the Chola, probably to appease him so that his strategic attention does not extend further than the Malay peninsula.

-Conversion to Islam

In the late 11th century, war infested Srivijaya sent ambassadors from Jambi and Palembang to China to seek peace solution against the Chola attack with newly emerging Jambi Muslims sent two more ambassadors to China in 1082 and 1088. This suggests that the power frequently shifted between Jambi and Palembang. Right after the Chola military left Kadaram(other name for Kedah), the 9th Hindu Rajah of Kedah Phra Ong Mahawangsa renounced the Hinduism and converted to Islam, which was introduced by Muslims from neighbouring Aceh, he also changed his name to Sultan Mudzafar Shah. He ruled the northern region of Malay Peninsula from 1136 to 1179.

-Kedah Rulers

Pre Islamic Kings

* Sri Paduka Maharaja Durbaraja, Raja of Langkasuka Kedah. Founder of the kingdom of Langkasuka.
* Sri Paduka Maharaja Diraja Putra
* Sri Paduka Maharaja Mahadewa
* Sri Paduka Maharaja Karnadiraja
* Sri Paduka Maharaja Karma
* Sri Paduka Maharaja Dewa II
* Sri Paduka Maharaja Dharmaraja I
* Sri Paduka Maharaja Mahajiwa. Styled "Phra Ong Maha Podisat" by the Siamese.

Sultans of Kedah

* Paduka Sri Sultan Muzaffar Shah I (1136–1179), styled "Phra Ong Mahawangsa" by the Siamese. Styled "Sri Paduka Maharaja Durbar Raja" before his accession.
* Sultan Muazzam Shah (1179–1201)
* Sultan Mohammed Shah (1201–1236)
* Sultan Maazul Shah (1236–1280)
* Sultan Mahmud Shah I (1280–1320)
* Sultan Ibrahim Shah (1320–1373)
* Sultan Sulaiman Shah I (1373–1422)
* Sultan Atadullah Muhammed Shah (1422–1472)
* Sultan Muhammed Jiwa Zainal Abidin I (1472–1506)
* Sultan Mahmud Shah II (1506–1546)
* Sultan Muzaffar Shah II (1546–1602)
* Sultan Sulaiman Shah II (1602–1625)
* Sultan Rijaluddin Shah (1625–1651)
* Sultan Muhiyuddin Shah (1651–1661)
* Sultan Ziauddin Al-Mukarram Shah (1661–1687)
* Sultan Atadullah Muhammed Shah II (1687–1698)
* Sultan Abdullah I Al-Muazzam Shah (1698–1706)
* Sultan Ahman Tajuddin Halim Shah I (1706–1709)
* Sultan Abdullah II (1709–1723)
* Sultan Atadullah Muhammed III (1723–1741)
* Sultan Muhammed Jiwa Zainal Abidin II (1741–1778)
* Sultan Abdullah Makarram Shah III (1778–1797)
* Sultan Ziyauddin Mukarram Shah II (1797–1803)
* Sultan Ahmad Tajuddin II Halim Shah (1803–1843)
* Sultan Zainal Rashid Muadzam Shah II (1843–1854)
* Sultan Ahmad Tajuddin III Mukarram Shah (1854–1879)
* Sultan Zainal Rashid Muadzam Shah III (1879–1881)
* Sultan Abdul Hamid Halim Shah (1881–1943)
* Sultan Badli Shah (1943–1958)
* Sultan Abdul Halim Muadzam Shah (1958-)

-The Burney Treaty 1826

The Burney Treaty was a treaty signed between Siam and the British in 1826. The treaty was named after the head emissary from the East India Company, Henry Burney. It acknowledged Siamese claim over the four northern Malay states of Kedah, Kelantan, Perlis and Terengganu. The treaty further guaranteed British ownership of Penang and their rights to trade in Kelantan and Terengganu without the Siamese interference. The four Malay states were not represented in the treaty negotiation.

-The Anglo-Siamese Treaty of 1909 or Bangkok Treaty of 1909

The Anglo-Siamese Treaty of 1909 or Bangkok Treaty of 1909 was a treaty between the United Kingdom and Siamese signed on March 10, 1909 in Bangkok.

The agreement, in which the Malays were not represented, effectively dissected the northern Malay states into two parts. The area around modern Pattani, Narathiwat, Songkhla, Satun and Yala remained under Thai control, while Thailand relinquished its claims to sovereignty over Kedah(Saiburi), Kelantan, Perlis and Terengganu which remained within the British sphere of influence as protectorates. These four states, along with Johor later became known as the Unfederated Malay States.

Originally, Satun and Perlis were part of the Malay Sultanate of Kedah but only Satun remained with Thailand. Patani, Narathiwat, Songkhla and Yala were historically ruled by the Malay Sultanate of Patani.

The British logic for sanctioning the continued Thai occupation of the remaining northern half of the Malaya was the perceived value of Thailand as a friendly buffer against the French in Indochina.

-Saiburi

Saiburi is the name for the Malay state of Kedah returned to Thailand when the Japanese occupied British Malaya during World War II.

In July 1943, Japanese Prime Minister Hideki Tojo announced that Kedah (along with Perlis, Kelantan and Terengganu) were to be returned to Thailand as part of the military alliance signed between Thailand and Japan on December 21, 1941.

From 18 October 1943 until the surrender of the Japanese at the end of the war, Kelantan, Terengganu, Kedah and Perlis were under Thai administration. On September 23, 1945, Kedah and the three other states were returned to the British.

The Siamese Influence on Malay Peninsula.

The Malay Peninsula was once known as Tanah Melayu (Malay Land). It extends from Singapore to the Isthmus of Kra bordering Burma, Thailand and Malay Land. Phuket is Bukit (hill) in Malay, "Satun" is "Setol" (a tropical fruit) was the Province of "Kedah" under the Malay Sultanate and Patani (Land of Farmers) was also part of the Malay Sultanate. In these areas people once spoke both English as well as Sam-sam, a local version of the Siamese language. The majority of residents were Muslims. Thailand pushed to dominate the peninsula as far as Malacca in the 1400s and held much of the peninsula for the next few centuries, including Temasek (Singapore) some of the Andaman Islands and a colony on Java, but eventually failed when the British used force to guarantee their suzerainty over the sultanate.

All the states of the Malay Sultanate presented annual gifts to the Thai king in the form of a golden flower, which understood the gesture to be tribute and an acknowledgement of vassalage(A vassal is one who enters into mutual obligations with a monarch in exchange for certain guarantees).

Ayutthaya Kingdom(1351-1767)

Ayutthaya was a Siamese kingdom that existed from 1351 to 1767. Ayutthaya was friendly towards foreign traders, including the Chinese, Vietnamese (Annamese), Indians, Japanese and Persians, and later the Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch and French, permitting them to set up villages outside the city walls. In the sixteenth century, it was described by foreign traders as one of the biggest and wealthiest cities in the East. The court of King Narai (1656–1688) had strong links with that of King Louis XIV of France, whose ambassadors compared the city in size and wealth to Paris.
Before Ayutthaya fell to a Burmese invasion, its vassals included the Northern Shan states of present-day Myanmar, Lanna (Chiang Mai, Thailand), Yunnan & Shan Sri (China), Lan Xang (Laos), Champa (Vietnam), and some city-states in the MALAY PENINSULA(Kedah).

According to foreign accounts, Ayutthaya was officially known as Siam, but many sources also say that the people of Ayutthaya called themselves Tai, and their kingdom Krung Tai or 'the Kingdom of the Tais'.

From the fifteenth century, Ayutthaya showed an interest in the MALAY PENINSULA, where the great trading port of Malacca contested its claims to sovereignty. Ayutthaya launched several abortive conquests on Malacca. Due to the military support of Ming China, Malacca was diplomatically and economically fortified. In the early fifteenth century the Ming Admiral Zheng He(Cheng Ho) had established one of his bases of operation in the port city, so the Chinese could not afford to lose such a strategic position to the Siamese. Under this protection, Malacca flourished into one of Ayutthaya's great foes, until its conquest in 1511 by the Portuguese.

Thonburi Kingdom(1768–1782)

Thon Buri was the capital of Thailand for a short time during the reign of King Taksin the Great, after the ruin of capital Ayutthaya by the Burmese. King Rama I removed the capital to Bangkok on the other side of the Chao Phraya River in 1782. Thon Buri stayed an independent town and province, and was merged into Bangkok in 1972.This is the period where Siam rose again after the Burmese destroy Ayutthaya.Despite its complete defeat and occupation by Burma, Siam made a rapid recovery. The resistance to Burmese rule was led by a noble of Chinese descent, Taksin, a capable military leader. Initially based at Chanthaburi in the south-east, within a year he had defeated the Burmese occupation army and re-established a Siamese state with its capital at Thonburi on the west bank of the Chao Phraya, 20 km from the sea. In 1768 he was crowned as King Taksin (now officially known as Taksin the Great). He rapidly re-united the central Thai heartlands under his rule, and in 1769 he also occupied western Cambodia. He then marched south and re-established Siamese rule over the MALAY PENINSULA as far south as PENANG and TERENGGANU. Having secured his base in Siam, Taksin attacked the Burmese in the north in 1774 and captured Chiang Mai in 1776, permanently uniting Siam and Lanna. Taksin's leading general in this campaign was Thong Duang, known by the title Chaophraya or Lord Chakri. In 1778 Chakri led a Siamese army which captured Vientiane, also Luang Phrabang, a northern Lao kingdom submitted, and eventually established Siamese domination over Laotian kingdoms.

Rattanakosin Kingdom(1782

Rattanakosin Kingdom or the Kingdom of Siam was the fourth Thai Kingdom, it was centered at the city of Bangkok. It included vassal states of Cambodia, Laos, and some MALAY KINGDOMS. The kingdom was founded by King Buddha Yodfa Chulaloke of the Chakri Dynasty. The first half of this period was a time of consolidation of the kingdom's power, and was punctuated by periodic conflicts with Burma, Vietnam and Laos. The later period was one of engagement with colonial powers of Britain and France, in which Siam managed to be the only southeast Asian nation to escape European colonialism. Internally the kingdom developed into a modern centralised nation state with borders defined by its interaction with the Western powers. Significant economic and social progress was made, with an increase in foreign trade, the abolition of slavery and the expansion of education to the emerging middle class. However, there was no substantial political reform until the abosulute monarchy was replaced in a revolution in 1932 by the constitutional monarchy. During Rama II's reign western influences again began to be felt in Siam. In 1785 the British occupied Penang, and in 1819 they founded Singapore. Soon the British displaced the Dutch and Portuguese as the main western economic and political influence in Siam. The British objected to the Siamese economic system, in which trading monopolies were held by royal princes and businesses were subject to arbitrary taxation. In 1821 the government of British India sent a mission to demand that Siam lift restrictions on free trade — the first sign of an issue which was to dominate 19th century Siamese politics.In 1825 the British sent another mission to Bangkok. They had by now annexed southern Burma and were thus Siam's neighbours to the west, and they were also extending their control over MALAYA. The King was reluctant to give in to British demands, but his advisors warned him that Siam would meet the same fate as Burma unless the British were accommodated. In 1826, therefore, Siam concluded its first commercial treaty with a western power. Under the treaty, Siam agreed to establish a uniform taxation system, to reduce taxes on foreign trade and to abolish some of the royal monopolies. As a result, Siam's trade increased rapidly, many more foreigners settled in Bangkok, and western cultural influences began to spread. The kingdom became wealthier and its army better armed.

The Siamese Revolution of 1932

The Siamese Revolution of 1932 or the Siamese Coup d'état of 1932 (การปฏิวัติสยาม พ.ศ. 2475 or การเปลี่ยนแปลงการปกครองสยาม พ.ศ. 2475) was a crucial turning point in Thai history in the 20th century. The revolution or the coup d'état was a bloodless transition on 24 June 1932, in which the system of government in Siam was changed from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy. The revolution was brought about by a group of military and civilians, who formed Siam's first political party, Khana Ratsadon (Peoples' Party). The revolution ended 150 years of absolutism under the House of Chakri and almost 700 years of absolute rule of Kings over Thai history. The Revolution was a product of global historical change as well as social and political changes domestically. The revolution also resulted in the people of Siam being granted their first Constitution.Also in 1939, Phibun changed the country's name from Siam to Prathet Thai, or Thailand, meaning "land of the free."

Malaysia Independence

The effort for independence was spearheaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra Al-Haj, the first Prime Minister of Malaysia, who led a delegation of ministers and political leaders of Malaya in negotiations with the British in London for Merdeka, or independence along with the first president of the Malayan Chinese Association (MCA) Tun Dato Sir Tan Cheng Lock and fifth President of Malaysian Indian Congress Tun V.T. Sambanthan. Once it became increasingly clear that the Communist threat posed during the Malayan Emergency was petering out, agreement was reached on February 8, 1956, for Malaya to gain independence from the British Empire. However, for a number of logistical and administrative reasons, it was decided that the official proclamation of independence would only be made the next year, on August 31, 1957, at Stadium Merdeka (Independence Stadium), in Kuala Lumpur.

The formation of Malaysia

The Federation of Malaysia, comprising the States of Malaya, North Borneo (later renamed Sabah), Sarawak and Singapore was to be officially declared on the date August 31, 1963, on the 6th anniversary of Malayan independence. However, it was postponed to September 16, 1963, mainly due to Indonesian and the Philippines' opposition to the formation of Malaysia. Nevertheless, North Borneo and Singapore declared sovereignty on August 31, 1963. Indonesian opposition later escalated to a military conflict. Indonesia considered Malaysia as a new form of colonization on the provinces of Sarawak and Sabah in the island of Borneo (bordering Kalimantan, Indonesia), which they laid claim on. To assure Indonesia that Malaysia was not a form of neo-colonialism, a referendum, organized by the United Nations, and the Cobbold Commission, led by Lord Cobbold, were formed to determine whether the people of Sabah and Sarawak wished to join Malaysia. Their eventual findings which indicated substantial support for Malaysia among the peoples of Sabah and Sarawak, cleared the way for the final proclamation of Malaysia.

The formation of the Federation of Malaysia was then announced on September 16, 1963 as Malaysia Day.

Based on the historic event that i research, it is clearly seen that we are here long time ago. Since the Kingdom of Ayutthaya until Rattanakosin Kingdom, our ancestor have involve and presence in Malay Peninsula. This can be prove clearly on Burney Treaty 1826 and Anglo-Siamese Treaty 1909.Kedah was vassal state to many state including Siam, and in 1811, Siamese conquer Kedah and made in a vassal state until Anglo-Siamese Treaty 1909.

Our ancestor may come to Kedah as soldier, a farmer, merchant, diplomatic envoy or maybe immigrant from other part of Siamese Kingdom. The way, time and walk of life our ancestor come to Kedah are many but one conclusion remain, they settled in Kedah and started our line in Kedah.

When the Siamese Revolution began, Siam was no longer Siam, it was converted to Thailand and the remnant of Siamese in Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan and Terengganu are not effected by the revolution. In 1957,Malaya Peninsula also gain it independence from United Kingdom and we are effected by the change because we stay in Kedah. That also clearly made us one of the Bumiputera because we have stay here long and does not return to Thailand. We remain here on our ancestral land like the aborigine on their own land.

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Kaum Siam jadi anak emas.












YB Dato' Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil akan merasmikan Program Skuad Sayang Negeri Kedah dan Parlimen Pendang di Kampung Tok Set, Pendang, Kedah pada 24 Jun 2010 jam 2.00 petang. Kampung Tok Set merupakan perkampungan kaum Siam dan Tok ketuanya bernama Nai Reang yang merupakan Penyelaras Masyarakat Siam Daerah Pendang merangkap AJK UMNO Bahagian Pendang.

Aturcara Majlis:

11.00 pg - Ketibaan orang ramai.
11.3o pg - Pertandingan Aspek Wanita.
1.oo tgh - Jamuan Makan dan Persembahan
2.00 ptg - Ketibaan YB Senator Dato' Seri Shahrizat Abd Jalil.
2.05 ptg - Persembahan Kebudayaan Siam.
2.10 ptg - Ucapan Aluan YB Suraya Yaacob, ADUN Sg. Tiang merangkap Pesuruhjaya Skuad Sayang Bahagian Pendang.
2.15 ptg - Ucapan YBhg. Dato' Paduka Haji Md Rozai Haji Shafian, Ketua UMNO bahagian Pendang merangkap Pengerusi Mayang Daerah Pendang.
2.30 ptg - Ucapan YBhg Datuk Maznah Binti Abdul Hamid, Pesuruhjaya Skuad Sayang Negeri Kedah.
2.45 ptg - Ucapan Perasmian oleh YB Senator Dato' Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, Menteri Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat merangkap Pesuruhjaya Skuad Sayang Kebangsaan.
3.15 ptg - Perasmian Skuad Sayang Pergerakan Wanita UMNO Negeri Kedah dan Parlimen Pendang dan Penyampaian Sumbangan kepada penerima bantuan.
3.40 ptg - Lawatan ke rumah pesakit kronik (lumpuh).
4.00 ptg - Bersuarai.

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Kandungan Perjanjian Bangkok 1909.


DITANDATANGANI DI BANGKOK, 10 HARI BULAN MAC 1909 (RATIFIKASI DIBUAT DI LONDON, 9 HARI BULAN JULAI 1909)

Duli Yang Maha Mulia Baginda King United Kingdom Great Britain dan Ireland dan Dominion British di seberang laut, Maharaja India, dan Duli Yang Maha Mulia Baginda Raja Siam berhasrat untuk menyelesaikan beberapa persoalan yang timbul yang menjejaskan kekuasaan masing-masing, telah membuat keputusan untuk mengikat suatu Perjanjian, dan bagi maksud ini, telah melantik Wakil Penuh Kerajaan masing-masing:

Duli Yang Maha Mulia Baginda King Great Britain melantik Ralph Paget, Esquire, Utusan Khas Baginda dan Menteri Wakil Penuh Kerajaan, dll.; Duli Yang Maha Mulia Raja Siam melantik Duli Yang Teramat Mulia Putera Devawongse Varoprakar, Menteri Hal Ehwal Luar dll.; yang, setelah menyampaikan Kuasa Wakil masing-masing dan mendapati segala-galanya baik dan sewajarnya, telah bersetuju tentang Perkara-perkara berikut:-

Perkara I
Penyerahan Kelantan, Terengganu, Kedah, Perlis, dan Pulau-pulau Bersebelahan kepada Great Britain.

Kerajaan Siam menyerah kepada Kerajaan British segala hak dan apa-apa jua kekuasaan, naungan, pentadbiran dan kawalan yang dimilikinya ke atas Negeri-negeri Kelantan, Terengganu, Kedah, Pedis dan pulau-pulau bersebelahan. Sempadan wilayah-wilayah ini ditentukan melalui Protokol Sempadan yang dilampirkan bersama-sama ini.

Perkara II Tarikh Penyerahan
Penyerahan yang diperuntukkan dalam Perkara terdahulu ini hendaklah dilakukan dalam tempoh tiga puluh hari selepas ratifikasi Perjanjian ini.

Perkara III Persempadanan Sempadan Inggeris-Siam
Suatu Suruhanjaya Bercampur, terdiri daripada kakitangan dan pegawai Siam dan British, hendaklah dilantik dalam tempoh enam bulan selepas tarikh ratifikasi

Perjanjian ini, dan hendaklah dipertanggungjawabkan bagi persempadanan sempadan yang bam. Kerja Suruhanjaya itu hendaklah dimulakan secepat mungkin, sesuai dengan musim, dan hendaklah dijalankan menurut Protokol Sempadan yang dilampirkan bersama-sama ini.

Rakyat Duli Yang Maha Mulia Baginda Raja Siam yang tinggal dalam wilayah yang diperihalkan dalam Perkara I yang berhasrat mengekalkan kerakyatan Siam mereka akan, dalam tempoh enam bulan selepas ratiftkasi Perjanjian ini, dibenarkan berbuat demikian jika mereka berdomisil di wilayah kekuasaan Siam. Kerajaan Duli Yang Maha Mulia Baginda King Great Britain mengaku janji bahawa mereka itu adalah bebas untuk mengekalkan harta tak alih mereka dalam wilayah yang diperihalkan dalam Perkara I.

Maka adalah difahami bahawa, menurut resam biasa di mana pertukaran kekuasaan berlaku, apa-apa Konsesi dalam wilayah yang diperihalkan dalam Perkara I Perjanjian ini kepada individu atau Syarikat, yang diberikan oleh atau dengan kebenaran Kerajaan Siam, dan diiktirafnya sebagai masih lagi berkuat kuasa pada tarikh penandatanganan Persetiaan ini akan diiktiraf oleh Kerajaan Duli Yang Maha Mulia Baginda King Great Britain.

Perkara IV Hutang Awam Wilayah yang Diserahkan
Kerajaan Duli Yang Maha Mulia Baginda King Great Britain mengaku janji bahawa Kerajaan Negeri-negeri Melayu Bersekutu akan membayar segala hutang yang ada kepada Kerajaan Siam bagi wilayah-wilayah yang diperihalkan dalam Perkara I.

Perkara V Penghapusan Bidang Kuasa Konsul di Siam
Bidang kuasa Mahkamah Antarabangsa Siam yang ditubuhkan di bawah Perkara VIII Perjanjian bertarikh 3 hari bulan September 1883, hendaklah, di bawah syarat yang ditentukan dalam Protokol Bidang Kuasa yang dilampirkan bersama-sama ini,4 diperluaskan supaya meliputi semua rakyat British di Negeri Siam yang berdaftar di Pejabat Konsul British sebelum tarikh Perjanjian ini.

Sistem ini hendaklah ditamatkan, dan bidang kuasa Mahkamah Antarabangsa itu hendaklah dipindahkan kepada Mahkamah Siam yang biasa selepas perisytiharan dan permulaan kuat kuasa kanun Siam, iaitu Kanun Jenayah, Kanun Sivil dan Perdagangan, Kanun Tatacara dan Undang-undang bagi penubuhan Mahkamah.

Semua rakyat British lain yang ada di Negeri Siam hendaklah tertakluk kepada bidang kuasa Mahkamah Siam yang biasa di bawah syarat-syarat yang ditentukan dalam Protokol Bidang Kuasa.

Perkara VI Hak terhadap Harta, Kediaman dan Perjalanan, Cukai, dU.
Layanan Negara - Pengecualian daripada Perkhidmatan Tentera, Pinjaman Paksa, dll.
Rakyat British di seluruh Negeri Siam boleh menikmati hak dan keistimewaan yang dinikmati oleh anak watan negeri itu, terutamanya hak terhadap harta, hak kediaman dan perjalanan.

Mereka dan harta mereka hendaklah tertakluk kepada segala cukai dan perkhidmatan, tetapi ini semua tidak boleh berbeza atau lebih tinggi daripada cukai dan perkhidmatan yang boleh dikenakan oleh undang-undang terhadap rakyat Siam. Maka adalah difahami secara khusus bahawa batasan dalam Perjanjian bertarikh 20 hari bulan September 1900, di mana pencukaian tanah tidak boleh melebihi tanah yang serupa di Hilir Burma, kini dibatalkan.

Rakyat British di Siam hendaklah dikecualikan daripada segala perkhidmatan tentera, sama ada dalam angkatan darat atau laut, dan daripada segala pinjaman paksa atau tuntutan atau sumbangan ketenteraan.

Perkara VII Pengesahan Perjanjian Lama
Peruntukan segala Perjanjian, Persetujuan, dan Konvensyen antara Great Britain dengan Siam, yang tidak diubah suai oleh Perjanjian ini, hendaklah kekal berkuat kuasa sepenuhnya.

Perkara VIII Ratifikasi
Perjanjian ini hendaklah diratiftkasikan dalam tempoh empat bulan dari tarikhnya. Pada menyaksikannya, maka Wakil Penuh Kerajaan masing-masing te1ah menandatangani Perjanjian ini dan mengecap padanya meterai masing-masing.

Dibuat di Bangkok, dalam dua salinan, pada 10 hari bulan Mac 1909.

(T.T.) RALPH PAGET.
(T.T.) DEVAWONGSE V AROPRAKAR.

Teks diambil dari Arkib Negara Malaysia, P.112. 2 Lihat Lampiran I (ed.).

Kaum Siam wujud di Kedah sejak nenek moyang lagi sebelum perjanjian ini ditandatangani. Oleh kerana negeri Kedah merupakan tempat tanah tumpah darah maka kebanyakkan kaum Siam kekal berada di sini walaupun kerajaan Siam memberi peluang untuk kaum Siam di Kedah balik ke Negeri Siam semasa Perjanjian Bangkok dilakukan. Kaum Siam wujud di sini sejak zaman "Kerajaan Kedah Tua" lagi dan terdapat dalam lipatan sejarah negeri Kedah.

Monday, June 14, 2010

Kaum minoriti Siam Malaysia adalah kaum pribumi.



Kaum minoriti Siam Malaysia berjumlah lebih kurang 60,000 orang merupakan kaum pribumi di Malaysia. Kebanyakkan penempatan mereka terdapat di bahagian utara tanah air iaitu di Perlis, Kedah, Perak, Pulau Pinang, Kelantan dan Terengganu.

Kaum minoriti Siam ini wujud di Malaysia terutamanya di Kedah sejak zaman pemerintahan kerajaan "Kedah Tua" lagi dan ia tercatat dalam sejarah negeri Kedah. Kewujudan kaum minoriti Siam ni tidak dapat dinafikan lagi oleh pemimpin-pemimpin politik di negeri Kedah.

Dalam undang2 tanah Rizab Melayu di negeri Kedah juga tercatat bahawa kaum Siam juga boleh memiliki Tanah Rizab Melayu di negeri Kedah. Ini bermakna kerajaan negeri Kedah mengiktiraf kaum minoriti Siam mempunyai hak sama rata dengan kaum Melayu.

Pada mulanya kaum Siam ini mempunyai 2 puak iaitu Siam Buddha dan Siam Islam. Siam Islam telah diserapkan sebagai Melayu Islam di negeri Kedah oleh YTM Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra Al Haj semasa beliau bertugas sebagai Pegawai Kerajaan Negeri Kedah. Golongan ini dikenali sebagai 'Sam-sam' dan mereka diiktiraf sebagai kaum Bumiputera seperti kaum Melayu.

Sementara kaum Siam Buddha masih kekal dengan mengamalkan cara hidup, adat resam, kebudayaan dan agama asal mereka. Oleh kerana kaum Siam ni merupakan kaum minoriti maka ia tidak mempunyai kuasa penentu atau pendesak dalam urusan pengubalan perlembagaan di peringkat negeri mahupun peringkat persekutuan.

Di peringkat negeri, kerajaan telah mengubah dasar berkaitan tanah rizab Melayu iaitu kerajaan menetapkan kaum Siam boleh menjual tanah kepada kaum Melayu tetapi kaum Siam tidak boleh membeli tanah kaum Melayu. Inilah yang menjadi permasalahan dalam masyarakat Siam di mana tanah yang dimiliki semakin hari semakin kecil. Ini dapat menjelaskan bahawa hak-hak samarata antara kaum Siam dengan kaum Melayu mula ditarik balik sikit demi sedikit.

Ramai pemimpin politik dari bawah hingga ke peringkat Menteri selalu melaungkan Siam adalah Bumiputera tetapi kemudahan yang disediakan oleh kerajaan untuk kaum Bumiputera telah dinafikan kepada kaum Siam seperti diskaun 5% pembelian rumah, lesen kontraktor kelas F, Sijil Kewangan dari kementerian kewangan, peluang ke IPTA dan sebagainya.


Kaum Siam diberi peluang melabur dalam ASN dan ASB adalah atas budibicara pemimpin politik ketika itu. Di mana pemimpin tersebut adalah ketua kaum Bumiputera yang mempunyai kuasa penentu iaitu Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad selaku Perdana Menteri. Tindakan memberi peluang kaum Siam melabur dalam ASB adalah untuk membantu meningkat taraf ekonomi kaum Siam yang masih mundur.


Bila dilihat dari segi politik pula, ketika itu UMNO mempunyai masalah dalaman sehingga UMNO pecah 2 dan wujudlah UMNO (baru) dan Parti Semangat 46. Untuk menarik sokongan rakyat terutama kaum minoriti Siam dalam pilihanraya Umum, maka kerajaan memberi kelonggaran kaum minoriti Siam melabur dalam saham ASB. Kaum Siam boleh melabur dalam ASB bukan bermaksud kaum Siam diiktiraf sebagai Bumiputera cuma atas dasar budibicara PM sahaja.

Di peringkat persekutuan pula, proses pengubalan undang-undang perlu dilakukan di Parlimen iaitu melalui Dewan Rakyat dan Dewan Negara. Oleh kerana, tiada seorang pun wakil rakyat dari kalangan kaum Siam maka kaum Siam tidak terlibat dalam pengubalan perlembagaan negara. Pihak ahli Parlimen yang dipilih oleh rakyat termasuk kaum minoriti Siam tidak cuba membawa suara kaum minoriti dalam pengubalan tersebut. Di mana pengubalan Perlembagaan Malaysia Perkara 160 (2) berkaitan taraf bumiputera tidak mengambil kira kaum minoriti Siam.

Pemimpin boleh melaungkan Siam adalah Bumiputera tetapi dalam bukti yang tercatit dalam Perlembagaan Malaysia Perkara 160 (2) menunjukkan kaum Siam bukan Bumiputera. Sekiranya para pemimpin betul2 ingin membela masyarakat Siam di Malaysia kenapa mereka tidak bersuara dalam Parlimen supaya kaum minoriti Siam ini turut terbela.

Selagi tiada catitan hitam putih, selagi itulah masyarakat Siam Malaysia bukannya Bumiputera. Hak-hak kaum minoriti Siam di Malaysia telah diketepikan oleh kerajaan yang memerintah negara yang telah mencapai umur 53 tahun merdeka. Sampai bila masyarakat Siam diperbodohkan oleh kerajaan.


Ditulis oleh;

Manit a/l See Nam

Setiausaha Persatuan Siam Kedah.

Tarikh: 14 Jun 2010

Sunday, June 13, 2010

Pak Menteri Kelentong SIAM BUMIPUTERA.


Kaum Siam bumiputera - Nazri

TUMPAT 12 Jun - Masyarakat Siam Kelantan dan di beberapa negeri di Semenanjung yang kesemuanya dianggarkan kira-kira 60,000 orang adalah kaum bumiputera di negara ini, kata Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz.

Masyarakat minoriti itu mempunyai hak yang sama dengan warga pribumi lain di samping menikmati pelbagai kemudahan yang disediakan oleh kerajaan, katanya kepada pemberita selepas merasmikan Seminar Wanita Siam Dalam Era Globalisasi di Wat Machimmaram, Kampung Jubakar di sini hari ini.

Majlis sehari itu dihadiri kira-kira 400 wanita masyarakat Siam yang tinggal di kawasan Tumpat dan Pasir Mas dalam usaha meningkatkan kefahaman golongan terbabit sebagai warga negara ini.

Sehubungan itu, Mohamed Nazri yang juga Penaung Persatuan Siam Malaysia menyarankan semua pihak agar memahami status kewarganegaraan yang dinikmati oleh masyarakat Siam di negara ini sebagaimana diperoleh kaum bumiputera lain.

Mengenai kedudukan kira-kira 100 orang masyarakat itu di Kelantan mempunyai kad pengenalan merah sedangkan mereka tinggal sejak awal lagi dan boleh membeli tanah sendiri di Kelantan, beliau berkata perkara itu akan disiasat sebelum tindakan susulan diambil.

"Kita harap ketua masyarakat Siam dapat menyenaraikan nama-nama mereka dan beri kepada saya bagi tindakan susulan... kalau betul tidak salah dia mempunyai kad pengenalan biru," katanya. - BERNAMA

Sumber: http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2010&dt=0613&pub=Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Dalam_Negeri&pg=dn_10.htm

The Star OnlinePublished: Saturday June 12, 2010 MYT 3:42:00 PM

Siamese community enjoys Bumi rights: Nazri

TUMPAT: Some 60,000 Siamese in the peninsular, who are categorised as Bumiputeras, enjoy Bumiputera rights like the Malays, said Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz.

"As such, all quarters must accord them the Bumiputera rights like other Bumiputeras," he told reporters after opening the Women in the Globalisation Era at the Machimmaram Siamese Temple at Kampung Jubakar here Saturday.

Mohamed Nazri, who is also the patron of the Malaysian Siamese Association, said Siamese living along the border of Thailand with Kelantan, Kedah, Perlis and Perak had lived in the country for a long time.

He urged all quarters to understand the Siamese citizenship status and accord them the Bumiputera rights.On the problem of about 100 Siamese without identity cards in Kelantan, Mohamed Nazri said he would investigate the matter.

About 400 Siamese women from Tumpat and Pasir Mas attended the seminar, which is meant to enlighten them on their citizen rights. - Bernama

Ini lagi satu kelentong orang-orang politik terhadap kaum Siam di Malaysia. Kalau betul kita diberi taraf Bumiputera, kenapa Pak Menteri tak suarakan dalam Parlimen? Kenapa tak ubah Perlembagaan Malaysia Perkara 160 (2)? Kenapa hanya lantang kat luar saja? Kalau tak ada kuasa nak ubah Perlembagaan Malaysia perkara 160 (2) jangan dok kelentong kaum Siam lagi. Mudah sangat ke?,, kelentong kaum Siam utk meraih sokongan utk undi BN lagi pada PRU13 nanti.

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Upacara pembakaran Ketua Sami Wat Lampam.


Upacara pembakaran Ketua Sami Wat Lampam akan dilakukan pada 1 - 3 Julai 2010 ini. Pembakaran sami semalam (7 Jun 2010) adalah Phorluang iaitu salah seorang sami yang tinggal di Wat Lampam. Bukannya pembakaran mendiang Phorchau Ren, bekas Ketua Sami Wat Lampam.

Hari ini saya masuk blog Hinghoi dan terbaca berita tentang pembakaran sami di Wat Lampam semalam. Saya pun rasa terkejut juga, takkan mayat mendiang Phorchau Ren dah disempurnakan. Langsung tak ada publisiti di kalangan masyarakat Siam Kedah. Tengok gambar majlis tu, nampak simple sangat tak setaraf dengan jasa beliau yang tersohor semasa beliau masih hidup.

Untuk menghilangkan kekeliruan ini, saya pun call la member lama Mr. Opat Rattanachot kat Utusan Malaysia untuk mendapat kepastian. Mr. Opat ini merupakan anak jati Kg. Lampam. Beliau menerangkan kepada saya, bahawa sami yang dibakar semalam adalah Phorluang salah seorang sami wat tersebut bukannya Phorchau Ren.

Mayat mendiang Phorchau Ren akan disempurnakan pada 1 - 3 Julai 2010.

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Pemimpin UMNO Kedah kata Siam tu Bumiputera tapi ...

PENJELASAN KEMENTERIAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI

DENGAN segala hormatnya, Kementerian ingin merujuk kepada akhbar Utusan Malaysia pada 26 Mei 2010 (Rabu) mengenai berita bertajuk Dengarlah Luahan Vicsofee: "Berdosakah saya menjadi Siam Malaysia" berkaitan lima (5) orang pelajar cemerlang dalam SPM dan seorang pelajar dalam STPM berketurunan Thai tidak mendapat tempat di IPTA.

Sukacita dimaklumkan bahawa Bahagian Pengurusan Kemasukan Pelajar, Jabatan Pengajian Tinggi, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi telah menyemak status permohonan calon SPM tahun 2009, ke Program Pengajian Lepasan SPM/Setaraf Sesi Akademik 2010/2011 seperti berikut:
1. Sukeht a/p Thavil
2. Vicsofee Sukahut
3. Maleewan a/p Perashot
4. Syalit Keowmani a/l Eh Sau
5. Elicesa Lalitta a/p Ea Chuan

Berdasarkan kepada rekod semakan, Bahagian ini mendapati empat orang calon berkenaan telah memohon secara Aplikasi Dalam Talian (on line) melalui Laman Web Rasmi Kemasukan Ke IPTA. Pilihan program pengajian calon adalah Program Asasi di UIAM dan Program Pengajian di UiTM yang terbuka kepada bumiputera sahaja.

Berdasarkan semakan rekod dengan Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara (JPN), status kaum calon, ibu dan bapa merupakan kaum Thai. Calon tidak dapat ditawarkan kerana tersalah memilih program yang dikhaskan kepada bumiputera.

Takrif Bumiputera yang diguna pakai dalam proses pemilihan kemasukan pelajar ke IPTA adalah berdasarkan Perlembagaan Persekutuan Malaysia Perkara 160 (2).

"Jika salah seorang ibu atau bapa calon adalah seorang Melayu yang beragama isle/Orang Asli seperti mana yang ditakrifkan dalam Perkara 160(2) Perlembagaan Persekutuan; maka anaknya dianggap seorang bumiputera.

"Dimaklumkan proses pemilihan pelajar ke IPTA adalah berasaskan kepada prinsip meritokrasi dengan mengguna pakai 90 peratus markah akademik dan 10 peratus markah kokurikulum. Walaupun Elicesa Lalita a/p Ea Chuan memohon program diploma, berdasarkan kepada pengiraan, markah merit calon ialah 69.86. Markah potongan (cut off point) bagi program yang dipohon adalah tinggi kerana bilangan tempat yang disediakan bagi program pengajian tersebut adalah terhad.

Walau bagaimanapun, pelajar berkaitan layak mengemukakan permohonan rayuan untuk pertimbangan semula bagi kes rayuan. Sehubungan dengan itu, Jabatan Pengajian Tinggi juga mengesahkan hanya tiga daripada lima calon berkaitan, telah mengemukakan rayuan melalui Aplikasi Dalam Talian (e-rayuan) untuk Program Pengajian Lepasan SPM/Setaraf.

Dasar pemilihan rayuan adalah untuk mengisi kekosongan tempat yang berlaku selepas pendaftaran pelajar baru ke IPTA. Semakan keputusan rayuan boleh dilakukan mulai minggu pertama Jun 2010 bagi Fasa 1 dan minggu ketiga Julai 2010 bagi Fasa 2 di Laman Web Rasmi Kemasukan Ke IPTA http://upu.mohe.gov.my/.

Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi juga mengesahkan bahawa calon Phisnukh Uttraphan A/L Pim No. KP 900904-03-5411 calon Lepasan SPM 2007, pernah mengemukakan permohonan bagi Program Pengajian Lepasan SPM/Setaraf Sesi Akademik 2008/2009 dan berjaya ditawarkan pilihan pertama C2425 - Diploma Kejuruteraan Elektronik di Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM). Dikenal pasti calon tidak mendaftar di universiti berkenaan.

Justeru tidak timbul isu Kementerian menolak permohonan dan tidak pernah mendapat tawaran ke IPTA.

Bahagian Pengurusan Kemasukan Pelajar, Jabatan Pengajian Tinggi telah menyemak rekod permohonan bahawa calon telah mengemukakan permohonan kemasukan ke Program Pengajian Lepasan STPM/Setaraf Sesi Akademik 2010/2011 di bawah Kategori STPM tahun semasa.

Calon akan dipertimbangkan berdasarkan syarat am dan khas program serta kriteria pemilihan yang ditetapkan. Pemilihan adalah berasaskan kepada prinsip meritokrasi dengan mengguna pakai 90 peratus markah akademik dan 10 peratus markah kokurikulum.

Keputusan tawaran kemasukan ke IPTA boleh disemak melalui Laman Web Rasmi Kemasukan Ke IPTA http://upu.mohe.gov.my/ mulai minggu ketiga Jun 2010.

Bahagian Pengurusan Kemasukan Pelajar
Jabatan Pengajian Tinggi
Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi MalaysiaSumber:
http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2010&dt=0602&pub=Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Forum&pg=fo_03.htm

Pemimpin UMNO Kedah cukup lantang bersuara mengatakan masyarakat Siam di negeri Kedah adalah Bumiputera tetapi hakikatnya kita tidak diiktiraf sebagai Bumiputera seperti yang termaktub dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan Malaysia perkara 160 (2). Sampai bila masyarakat Siam ditipu kerana ingin mendapat undi semasa Pilihanraya Umum sahaja. Sedangkan tiada siapa yang sanggup membela kaum minoriti ini. Setiap perubahan dalam perlembagaan persekutuan Malaysia tidak mengambil kira golongan minoriti seperti kaum Siam.